Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 145172

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : January | Volume : 18 | Issue : 1 | Page : SC30 - SC33 Full Version

Evaluation of Developmental Delay in Term Babies on Ventilator Support: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: January 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/67536.18963
R Hemanth Kumar, Jayesh Chandran

1. Postgraduate, Nitte Institute of Physiotherapy, NITTE (Deemed to be University), Deralakatte, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India. 2. Assistant Professor (Grade II), Department of Physiotherapy, Nitte Institute of Physiotherapy, NITTE (Deemed to be University), Mangaluru, Karnataka, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Jayesh Chandran,
Assistant Professor (Grade II), Department of Physiotherapy, Nitte Institute of Physiotherapy, NITTE (Deemed to be University), Mangaluru-575018, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: jayeshnairpt@gmail.com; rhk3027@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Developmental limitation in two or more developmental domains that affects children under the age of five is termed as developmental delay. Due to various reasons such as drug-induced toxicity and maternal variables like a history of drinking, smoking, or infections during pregnancy (e.g., rubella), neonates may require admission to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). Although NICU admission improves survival rates, the extended stay and the use of different types of equipment in the NICU may lead to developmental delay.

Aim: To identify the developmental delays in critically ill full-term babies on ventilator support, using the Ages and Stages Questionnaire-3 (ASQ-3) scale.

Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was designed to evaluate developmental delays in term babies receiving ventilator support. A total of 35 babies who met the inclusion criteria were included in the study. Once the babies reached 17 to 18 months of age, parents were given ASQ-3 to complete. The data were analysed and expressed as mean, standard deviation, frequency, and percentage.

Results: Out of the 35 full-term babies on ventilator support, 22 babies (62.9%) showed lower values in gross motor function, 12 (34.3%) in fine motor function, and 12 (34.3%) in problem-solving skills compared to communication and other components, according to ASQ-3.

Conclusion: The findings of this research suggest that critically ill full-term infants on ventilator support exhibit significant developmental delays, particularly in gross motor, fine motor, and problem-solving skills.

Keywords

Ages and stages questionnaire-3, Full-term baby, Gross motor, Mechanical ventilator support, Neonatal intensive care unit

Infants with delayed development lag behind their peers in achieving age-appropriate developmental milestones. Global Developmental Delay (GDD) is the term used to describe a developmental limitation in two or more developmental domains that affects children under the age of five (1). A study conducted in 2016 concluded that 1.15 crore children in India, or 2 percent of all children worldwide, experience developmental delays (2). Developmental delay has become a significant issue in low and middle-income nations (3),(4),(5).

A newborn may be transferred to the NICU for various reasons. For instance, factors such as drug-induced toxicity and maternal variables like a history of drinking, smoking, or infections during pregnancy such as rubella and toxoplasmosis, or early maternal illnesses (6). Additionally, the child’s admission to the NICU for ventilator support may be due to intrauterine growth retardation, perinatal asphyxia, hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy, smothering of the newborn, starvation, or umbilical cord knotting (6). Although NICU admission improves the chances of survival, the extended duration of stay and the use of various technologies may have long-term effects, including an increased risk of cognitive impairments, delays in socialisation and development, and developmental delays (7). Prolonged artificial ventilation in premature newborns is associated with delayed development and compromised brainstem development. Each additional day of mechanical ventilation is linked to a decline in motor scores (8).

Early intervention programs were established to address the developmental needs of neonatal intensive care survivors and to stimulate and normalise their development (5). Early intervention programs are multidisciplinary services provided to children from birth to six years of age, aiming to promote their health and well-being (7).

The well-being of infants and children relies on the early identification of developmental delays, as prompt referrals to medical attention reduce the risk of persistent issues in the future. While performance-based evaluation of early childhood development is ideal, there are several disadvantages to this method when determining the best approach for an individual child or when investigating how an intervention or specific risk exposure affects development in resource-constrained environments (9),(10). The ASQ-3 can be employed more extensively in public and research investigations (10). Existing literature (11) has demonstrated that preterm and underweight babies who remain in the NICU are more prone to developmental delay (7),(10). While a study has examined the effects of invasive ventilators, such as tracheostomy, on preterm babies leading to developmental delay, no studies have been conducted on how non invasive ventilator support affects critically ill full-term babies (1). Due to the limited available literature, the main objective of this study was to assess developmental delay in critically ill full-term babies who received non invasive ventilator support, using the ASQ-3 scale.

Material and Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted at Justice KS Hegde Charitable Hospital, Deralakatte, Mangalore, Karnataka, India from March 2022 to February 2023. Two time periods were considered: the first period was when the term infants were placed on a ventilator immediately after delivery, and the second period was when the babies reached 17 and 18 months of age. The proposed study was approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC) of Nitte Institute of Physiotherapy in Mangalore, Karnataka, with reference no NIPT/IEC/Min/10/2021-2022, dated 12-02-2022.

Inclusion criteria: Low moderate risk full-term babies who received ventilator support in the NICU (risk classification based on APGAR score greater than 4 at 1 and 5 minutes) (10), babies aged between 17 and 18 months (as ASQ-3 is more reliable and valid for older children beyond 18 months) (9), babies who received more than 48 hours of ventilator support, and parents who were proficient in English were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Preterm babies with spinal and brain anomalies, babies who underwent tracheostomy, babies with genetic disorders, babies with peripheral nerve injuries, and babies with congenital anomalies were excluded from the study.

Sample size: The estimated sample size for this study was 35, based on a previous study, with a 90% confidence level and a 10% margin of error (2). Samples were screened based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The parents were provided with an assent form containing explanatory information and were encouraged to participate in the research. Parents had the option to withdraw their baby from the study at any time. Full-term babies admitted to the NICU for ventilator support after birth were enrolled from the register. The address and contact information were obtained from the medical record department of Justice K.S. Hegde Hospital between November 2020 and July 2021.

A total of 89 babies were initially identified, out of which 44 were recognised as full-term babies. After considering factors such as distance, language, and willingness to participate in the study, 35 babies were included in the final study sample. The caregivers were provided with the ASQ-3 questionnaire to complete when the babies reached 18 months of age (6),(10),(12),(13). The ASQ-3 is a widely used series of developmental questionnaires that serves as one of the most commonly used caregiver report outcome measures worldwide. It is designed to identify developmental delays in children between the ages of two and sixty-six months, with different cut-off scores for each month. The questionnaire assesses five key areas of development: communication, gross motor skills, fine motor skills, problem-solving, and personal-social skills. Each area consists of six items, resulting in a total of 30 items. The questionnaire can be completed quickly and easily, taking only 15 minutes (9),(11). The rating system for the ASQ-3 is based on a scale of three points: a score of 0 indicates that the task has not yet been accomplished, a score of 10 indicates that the activity can be performed, and a score of 5 suggests that it may be completed at some point. The ASQ-3 has demonstrated an 86% sensitivity and 85% specificity, with intra- and inter-reliability of 93%. The interpretation and cut-off scores for the ASQ-3 are provided in (Table/Fig 1) (13).

Statistical Analysis

All data analyses were conducted using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows (version 20.0, SPSS). The data were analysed and presented as mean, standard deviation, frequency, and percentage.

Results

This study included a total of 35 samples. The gender distribution of the samples was 18 (51.4%) females and 17 (48.6%) males (Table/Fig 2). The mean±SD age of the babies was 17.69 ±0.4710 months. Among the 35 term babies, 19 had respiratory distress syndrome, five had transient tachypnoea, four had meconium aspiration syndrome, four had grade-1 hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy, two had congenital pneumonia, and one had pulmonary hypoplasia.

The mean values of male and female communication, gross motor skills, fine motor skills, problem-solving, and personal-social skills are shown in (Table/Fig 3).

In the communication domain, 24 (68.6%) were considered to be normal, and 11 (31.4%) were categorised as monitoring. Results for fine motor abilities revealed that 12 (34.3%) of the babies exhibited developmental delays, 1 (2.9%) fell into the monitoring category, whereas 22 (62.9%) were classified as normal. In problem-solving, 8 (44.4%) of the girls had developmental delays, while 10 (55.6%) were classified as normal. In the personal-social domain of the ASQ-3, the majority of babies 22 (62.9%) were classified as normal, 7 (20%) fell into the monitoring category, and 6 (17.1%) exhibited developmental delay (Table/Fig 4).

Discussion

Infants who received ventilator support experienced a significant delay in gross motor function, and to a lesser extent, in fine motor function and problem-solving skills. These results suggest that, despite the improved survival rate associated with NICU admission, term babies may still face difficulties in later life due to their prolonged stay in the NICU and the various equipment used, such as oxygen hoods, ventilators, and nasal cannulas. This finding was consistent with a previous case study conducted by Sant N et al., which involved a seven-month-old infant boy with a history of preterm birth, poor APGAR score, and a three-month NICU stay (4). The patient later presented to the physiotherapy outpatient department with complaints of delayed motor milestones, including difficulties in head holding, rolling, and hand movements.

The objective of the ASQ-3 questionnaire was to assess a child’s development in five domains over time: problem-solving, fine motor skills, gross motor skills, communication, and personal-social skills, within the age range of 2-60 months. This questionnaire provides valuable information about the infant’s development and helps therapists identify areas that require focused attention (5),(6),(9),(10). In a comparison of the validity between the Bayley III NL and ASQ-3, it was found that ASQ-3 performed better in identifying older children (18-24 months) with developmental delays (5). As a stand-alone measure for identifying developmental delays in children, the ASQ-3 is widely used by caregivers globally. It has demonstrated adequate psychometric properties, especially when used with high-risk children or those with severe neurodevelopmental delays, in high-income settings (9).

Previous research conducted by Shin HI and Shin HI, revealed that infants with tracheostomy experienced a significant delay in head control in the supine position and rolling from prone to supine (1). One possible reason for this difference is that these infants may not have spent enough time in the prone position. The study hypothesised that a higher supine-to-prone score, compared to a prone-to-supine score, indicated a gross motor developmental delay (2). In the current research, it was found that the samples may have spent more time in the supine position than in the prone position, which contributed to a decline in gross motor development.

Another study by Guillot M et al., found that preschool-aged children with severe respiratory illnesses and preterm births had poor motor scores for each additional day they required ventilator support (14). This suggests that extended usage of mechanical ventilators, as seen in the target group of the study, is associated with lower motor scores due to complications such as respiratory distress. A longitudinal study by de Mendonça KT et al., also found a relationship between poor gross motor development and the use of oxygen therapy and non invasive ventilator assistance during the hospital stay in the NICU (8). Considering that the samples in this study also had prolonged periods of mechanical ventilator use, this finding further supports the link between mechanical ventilation and poor gross motor development.

While extended use of mechanical ventilators is associated with various morbidities and mortality, it is still necessary in cases of severe medical conditions. According to Hunt KA et al., babies who required ventilator care for more than 72 hours were more likely to experience serious bronchopulmonary problems (15). Bose CL et al., also confirmed that prolonged ventilator use in preterm infants can cause organ damage, increase systemic inflammation, and have detrimental effects such as cerebral palsy and cognitive impairment (16). Prolonged ventilator use can harm the corticospinal tract, increasing the risk of significant neurodevelopmental impairments like cerebral palsy and damaging white matter, thereby affecting both motor and cognitive function (16),(17). Since the target population of the current research also had an extended period of non invasive mechanical ventilator use, it is understandable that decreased scores in motor functions were observed.

A history of prolonged labour during birth contributes to low or poor APGAR scores in the first and fifth minutes of life in most children with early motor deficits. According to Ibrahim SA and Zangana KO these are primary manifestations of moderate and severe hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy, which significantly increase the need for ventilator support in the NICU (18). The samples from the current study displayed developmental delays and required ventilator support due to hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy, similar to the findings of the previous study.

Limitation(s)

As the study questionnaire was in English, some participants who were uneducated were unable to answer the questionnaire. Consequently, they had to be excluded from the study. This limitation prevents the study from providing insights into potential measures that could be taken to mitigate the effects observed and provide support for these children. Additionally, due to the limited sample size, the results cannot be generalised to the wider population. Conducting a similar study with a larger sample size in the future would be beneficial.

Conclusion

According to this study, babies who received non invasive ventilator support experienced delays in their development. Full-term babies who were placed on non invasive ventilator support shortly after birth exhibited a significant delay in early motor development, specifically in gross and fine motor movements, as assessed by the ASQ-3 questionnaire.

Acknowledgement

The researchers would like to express their gratitude to all the parents who participated in the study. They would also like to extend their thanks to NIPT (Nitte Institute of Physiotherapy, NITTE Deemed to be University) for providing the facilities and support necessary to complete this study.

References

1.
Shin HI, Shin HI. Delayed development of head control and rolling in infants with tracheostomies. Front Pediatr. 2020;8:571573. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Olusanya BO, Davis AC, Wertlieb D, Boo NY, Nair MKC, Halpern R, et al. Developmental disabilities among children younger than 5 years in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Glob Heal. 2018;6(10):e1100-21. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Mithyantha R, Kneen R, McCann E, Gladstone M. Current evidence-based recommendations on investigating children with global developmental delay. Arch Dis Child. BMJ Publishing Group. 2017;102(11):1071-76. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Sant N, Hotwani R, Palaskar P, Naqvi WM, Arora SP. Effectiveness of early physiotherapy in an infant with a high risk of developmental delay. Cureus. 2021;13(7):e16581. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Duggan C, Irvine AD, O’B Hourihane J, Kiely ME, Murray DM. ASQ-3 and BSID-III’s concurrent validity and predictive ability of cognitive outcome at 5 years. Pediatr Res. 2023;(July 2022):01-07. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Rothstein A, Miskovic A, Nitsch K. Brief review of psychometric properties and clinical utility of the ages and stages questionnaires, third edition for evaluating pediatric development. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98(4):809-10. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2016.11.001. [crossref]
7.
Chen H, Zhang X, Wang H, Hu X. Complications of upper extremity versus lower extremity placed peripherally inserted central catheters in neonatal intensive care units: A meta-analysis. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2020;56:102753. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2019.08.003. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
de Mendonça KT, Lanza FC, de Sousa Morais RL, Camargos ACR. Clinical factors associated with abnormal general movements of preterm newborns during hospitalization in a neonatal intensive care unit. Early Hum Dev. 2022;174:105682. Doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2022.105682. Epub 2022 Sep 30. PMID: 36206619. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Colbert AM, Connery AK, Lamb MM, Bauer D, Olson D, Paniagua-Avila A, et al. Caregiver rating of early childhood development: Reliability and validity of the ASQ-3 in rural Guatemala. Early Hum Dev. 2021;161:105453. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Yue A, Jiang Q, Wang B, Abbey C, Medina A, Shi Y, et al. Concurrent validity of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire and the Bayley Scales of Infant Development III in China. PLoS One. 2019;14(9):e0221675. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Steenis LJP, Verhoeven M, Hessen DJ, van Baar AL. Parental and professional assessment of early child development: The ASQ-3 and the Bayley-III-NL. Early Hum Dev. 2015;91(3):217-25. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2015.01.008. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Alvarez-Nuñez L, González M, Rudnitzky F, Vásquez-Echeverría A. Psychometric properties of the ASQ–3 in a nationally representative sample of Uruguay. Early Hum Dev. 2021;157(March):01-07. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
, Squires J, Bricker D. Ages & Stages QuestionnairesThird Edition (ASQ®-3): A Parent-Completed Child Monitoring System. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co., Inc.
14.
Guillot M, Guo T, Ufkes S, Schneider J, Synnes A, Chau V, et al. Mechanical ventilation duration, brainstem development, and neurodevelopment in children born preterm: A prospective cohort study. J Pediatr. 2020;226:87-95.e3. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Hunt KA, Dassios T, Ali K, Greenough A. Prediction of bronchopulmonary dysplasia development. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2018;103(6):F598-99. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Bose CL, Laughon MM, Allred EN, O’Shea TM, Van Marter LJ, Ehrenkranz RA, et al; ELGAN Study Investigators. Systemic inflammation associated with mechanical ventilation among extremely preterm infants. Cytokine. 2013;61(1):315-22. Doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2012.10.014. Epub 2012 Nov 11. PMID: 23148992; PMCID: PMC3518391.[crossref][PubMed]
17.
Kerstjens JM, Bocca-Tjeertes IF, de Winter AF, Reijneveld SA, Bos AF. Neonatal morbidities and developmental delay in moderately preterm-born children. Pediatrics. 2012;130(2):e265-72. Doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-0079. Epub 2012 Jul 9. PMID: 22778308. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Ibrahim SA, Zangana KO. Prognostic factors of the developmental outcome in neonates after hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy. Adv Med J. 2022;6(2):90-99. Available from: https://amj.khcms.edu.krd/index.php/main/article/view/22.[crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/67536.18963

Date of Submission: Sep 14, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Oct 07, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Dec 02, 2023
Date of Publishing: Jan 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Sep 15, 2023
• Manual Googling: Oct 18, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Nov 29, 2023 (7%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 8

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com